What's the difference
between a conservation plan and a management
plan?
To cover the needs for
natural and cultural heritage, and areas containing
many heritage features, this Website uses the term
management plan. Natural and cultural heritage
professionals use different terminology, as do lay
people.
Conservation plan is
the term most often used when dealing with historic
heritage places. Conservation plans are very useful
as detailed guides to protect features of
recognised heritage significance. They outline
policy or objectives for a heritage place,
resulting from a conservation analysis, which
covers Steps 1,
2
, 3
and 4
of this Website. Conservation plans are usually
prepared by historic heritage conservation
specialists who consult with the people involved.
The work of applying the policies to a place and
developing detailed strategies and actions is often
left up to the managers of a place. A useful guide
for preparing plans is The Conservation Plan
by James Semple Kerr, available from the National
Trust. See details in the Resources
section.
Management plans
usually go further than conservation plans and
include more thought on the practical, political,
resource and economic circumstances affecting the
place and the best ways to deal with these issues.
They are often best prepared by a group of people
actively involved in managing the site.
'Management plan' is the more
common terminology for plans which are prepared for
areas containing many natural and cultural heritage
places, such as protected areas, areas like water
catchments and as well as for Indigenous heritage
places. Management plans are also often required
under Commonwealth and state environment
legislation.
You may come across the term
'Conservation management plan' or 'CMP', which is a
conservation plan with some consideration of
management issues.

|